“Yesterday
is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is
called the present.” – Kungfu
Panda
“Don’t
let the past blackmail your future, to ruin a beautiful present.”-
Dear Zindagi
Most ideas revolving
around the concept of the past appear to reinforce and reiterate a single idea;
the past isn’t something that should be dragged or clung onto. This, however
does beget a simple yet seemingly unresolvable question – if the past is meant
to be left behind, why does it continue to resurface?
Individuals who have been
approached with the topic of the past, even when engaged in casual
conversations often remark about the frustrating effects of its resurgence. The
waves of the past have spared none in its resurgence, dousing even the most peaceful,
calm, and detached individuals, who would often find themselves confronting what
is commonly dubbed as the ‘ghosts of their past’. These ‘ghosts’ as we know
tend to vary depending on the individual, with no age limit when it comes to its impact, thus
contributing to its universality.
Once we have gauged an
understanding of the nature of the past, as well as its universality, we can
approach the million-dollar question through an examination of certain integral
concepts such as time, and come up with some intriguing theories that would at
least convey some semblance of closure, or at the very least, attempt to seal
certain loopholes.
Time is an integral
element of the past, and previously before the works of contemporary psychologists
and philosophers such as Sigmund Freud, the concept of time was believed to be
eternal and absolute. Time previously referred to what was measured by external
clocks and calendars, and what is termed as chronological time. As put forward
by Henry Bergson, chronological time can be measured by external sources and
perspectives, and thus flows uniformly for each individual.
The notion of
psychological time, as the other perspective observed by Bergson, is a vital
and underrated aspect, which emerged as a popular concept in the 20th
century. Unlike chronological time, the instrument of measurement when it comes
to psychological time revolves around human states of consciousness, which
cannot be measured by material objects. Psychological time, also known as ‘duree’,
is something that is experienced within and thus does not flow uniformly. This
highlights ‘duree’ as a notion brimming with fluidity, which in turn varies
according to each individual’s mind, and the way they perceive their internal
state of consciousness.
Through an application of
Bergson’s perspectives regarding time, it becomes increasingly evident that the
concept of time consists of two facets. Each portrays a different aspect of the
above concept, which in turn plays a significant role in the resurgence of one’s
past. The fluidity of psychological time and the lag between the two facets
could thus be perceived as a plausible explanation for the reappearance of the
past.
An individual with exposure
to some kind of traumatic event, for instance, would inevitably suffer the
psychological repercussions that accompany it. This would ultimately lead to a heightened
form of anxiety, as the individual is constantly faced with triggers that
remind them of the transpired incident, thus creating a lag between ‘duree’ and
chronological time. The individual’s state of consciousness is not in line with
chronological time, and the disparity created, impacts their quality of life, making
them feel as if they are constantly battling the ‘ghosts ‘of their past.
This disparity between
external and internal time, including its effects on people, could be compared
with the effect created when one’s rational side of the brain is not in sync
with its emotional side. When either side is completely discarded, an
individual’s inner state of mind becomes severely compromised, resulting in a
state of mind that one could label as a state of absurdity and severe
instability. An overindulgence of emotion leads to delusion coupled with an insatiable
desire to feel good at any cost. On the other hand, an overindulgence of
rationality leads to chronic indifference, which in turn, impacts the
individual’s ability to connect and empathize with others, which ultimately
leads to a feeling of hopelessness and lack of purpose.
Resolution then lies in easing
the disparity and sealing the lag created by the two facets of time, enabling
the smooth functioning of the above two in coordination with each other, in
order to restore the lost equilibrium. Like the rational and the emotional parts
of the brain, ‘duree’ and chronological time must ideally be bound together in
holy matrimony, in order to exorcise those ‘ghosts’ and reduce the potential of
their resurgence.
However, the resolution
itself poses numerous obstacles, as it violates certain fundamental principles
of the human condition, such as the disillusionment surrounding the notion of self-control.
Most of the external incidents that surround us tend to be the work of forces
that are completely out of our control. External factors such as the weather, outcomes
of relationships, the forces of nature to name a few, are entirely out of our
mundane control, and attempts to control such factors are not only futile, but
prove to be absurd as well.
The lack of control we
have towards outside forces, are reflective of our hold over chronological time.
While we may be held accountable for certain actions that perpetuate certain
conditions ranging from small scale incidents such as relationships, and career
prospects, to large scale events like war and daily inequities, those actions
reflect what is perhaps only approximately two percent of the control we possess
over external events. By now, it is apparent that individuals do not possess
absolute control over external events, consequently leading to them being
subject, to the conditions and proceedings, imposed and demanded by
chronological time.
Our inner states of
consciousness on the other hand, possibly provide more scope for self-control,
as they revolve around the internal state of our mind, and how it perceives unfolded
events. Theoretically, one would assume that in order to restore equilibrium,
one would simply need to adjust their mindset and alter the manner in which
they perceive events, to gain some form of self-control. After all, even renowned
philosophers such as Socrates have declared that the root of all virtue lies in
reason.
However, as stated
previously when one attempts to rely on reason as the main solution, it results
in indifference and a sense of hopelessness. Furthermore, the ability to simply
alter your perspective based on external events caters to the illusion of
self-control. Most often, individuals are aware of their actions, choices, and outcomes,
yet they lack the willpower to do so. Will power comes from feeling, which requires
emotion, thus proving that reason, logic and rationality cannot be frequently
applied to alter one’s inner state, so that it suits their external circumstances.
For instance, if a close family member passes away, we know that the logical
solution lies in accepting their death, and moving on. We are also aware that death
is inevitable, yet we are constantly grief-stricken when faced with the death
of a loved one. Even manageable situations or so-called “first world problems”
like relationship complications of dealing with being rejected by the one you
love, does not ease the intensity of the pain caused, even though we are aware
that the solution lies in not taking everything personally, and to forgive and move
on. This goes on to show that although individuals are aware of the solution, they
do not implement it because they don’t feel
like doing so.
Society has ingrained the
belief that in order to do something, one must simply want to do so, and muster
enough courage to get there. A belief that altering our perspective is, as
simple as deciding to do it and having the spirit to do so. This belief is
quite damaging as it feeds into the illusion of self-control. Controlling one’s
mind is as futile as attempting to control the sea and the intensity of its
waves. It is not just unreasonable. It is impossible. Therefore, as
self-control is an illusion, we cannot exert control over our inner state of
consciousness, making us subject to the circumstances enforced by psychological
time.
By now we have
established that a plausible explanation for the resurgence of the past is due
to the lag created when one’s psychological time does not tally with the forces
of chronological time. Moreover, we have also explored the disillusionment involved
in the concept of self-control, which portrayed the lack of control over the
above two facets of time. It is apparent therefore that individuals are subject
to the ravaging forces of time and are at the mercy of nature.
If, individuals have no
control over external and internal influences, we could assume that individuals
are not responsible for experiencing triggers, and cannot be held accountable
for the lag created between chronological and psychological time. Furthermore,
if individuals are at the mercy of the forces of time and nature, it begets a
more concerning and uncomfortable question – can man truly be blamed for the recurrence
of history, if there are other forces at work? If the ghosts of the past cannot
be truly vanquished, can individuals be held accountable for the recurrence of
the larger events at work?
All of this points to one
crucial fact - the absence of self-control places individuals at the mercy of
the forces of the environment and the universe. When we can’t control the ways
of the universe, and human nature, we adapt and learn to accept the conditions
of our being, instead of fighting against it. Similarly, when individuals learn
to accept the fluidity of their states of consciousness, and understand its
nature in relation to chronological time, they will understand that it is not ‘ghosts’
that need to be dispelled, but ‘waves’ of the past that need to be ridden.
At the start, the waves
may overwhelm you, engulf you, knock you over, and perhaps even pull you under.
But, we often forget that it would never kill us. Gradually, with patience and
understanding, we would adapt and learn to gauge the intensity of the waves,
and in doing so, surf the waves of the past until one day, the lag between the
two facets of time simply cease to exist.
“To gain control, one
must accept the fact that they have no control” – the hopeful pessimist

